Duplicates.h
Go to the documentation of this file.00001 /******************************************************************************* 00002 * 00003 * Copyright (c) 2008-2010 Michael Schulze <mschulze@ivs.cs.uni-magdeburg.de> 00004 * 2010 Marcus Foerster <MarcusFoerster1@gmx.de> 00005 * All rights reserved. 00006 * 00007 * Redistribution and use in source and binary forms, with or without 00008 * modification, are permitted provided that the following conditions 00009 * are met: 00010 * 00011 * * Redistributions of source code must retain the above copyright 00012 * notice, this list of conditions and the following disclaimer. 00013 * 00014 * * Redistributions in binary form must reproduce the above copyright 00015 * notice, this list of conditions and the following disclaimer in 00016 * the documentation and/or other materials provided with the 00017 * distribution. 00018 * 00019 * * Neither the name of the copyright holders nor the names of 00020 * contributors may be used to endorse or promote products derived 00021 * from this software without specific prior written permission. 00022 * 00023 * 00024 * THIS SOFTWARE IS PROVIDED BY THE COPYRIGHT HOLDERS AND CONTRIBUTORS "AS 00025 * IS" AND ANY EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING, BUT NOT LIMITED 00026 * TO, THE IMPLIED WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTABILITY AND FITNESS FOR A 00027 * PARTICULAR PURPOSE ARE DISCLAIMED. IN NO EVENT SHALL THE COPYRIGHT 00028 * OWNER OR CONTRIBUTORS BE LIABLE FOR ANY DIRECT, INDIRECT, INCIDENTAL, 00029 * SPECIAL, EXEMPLARY, OR CONSEQUENTIAL DAMAGES (INCLUDING, BUT NOT 00030 * LIMITED TO, PROCUREMENT OF SUBSTITUTE GOODS OR SERVICES; LOSS OF USE, 00031 * DATA, OR PROFITS; OR BUSINESS INTERRUPTION) HOWEVER CAUSED AND ON ANY 00032 * THEORY OF LIABILITY, WHETHER IN CONTRACT, STRICT LIABILITY, OR TORT 00033 * (INCLUDING NEGLIGENCE OR OTHERWISE) ARISING IN ANY WAY OUT OF THE USE 00034 * OF THIS SOFTWARE, EVEN IF ADVISED OF THE POSSIBILITY OF SUCH DAMAGE. 00035 * 00036 * 00037 * $Id$ 00038 * 00039 ******************************************************************************/ 00040 00041 #ifndef _Duplicates_h_ 00042 #define _Duplicates_h_ 00043 00044 #include "boost/mpl/begin.hpp" 00045 #include "boost/mpl/end.hpp" 00046 #include "boost/mpl/next.hpp" 00047 #include "boost/mpl/deref.hpp" 00048 00049 #include "boost/mpl/eval_if.hpp" 00050 #include "boost/mpl/count_if.hpp" 00051 00052 #include "mw/attributes/type_traits/is_same_base_type.h" 00053 00054 namespace famouso { 00055 namespace mw { 00056 namespace attributes { 00057 namespace detail { 00058 00071 template <typename AttrSeq, typename Iter = typename boost::mpl::begin<AttrSeq>::type> 00072 struct Duplicates { 00073 private: 00074 // The current attribute 00075 typedef boost::mpl::deref<Iter> curAttr; 00076 00077 // A predicate testing every attribute of the sequence against the current 00078 // one based on the base type 00079 typedef famouso::mw::attributes::type_traits::is_same_base_type< 00080 boost::mpl::_1, 00081 typename curAttr::type 00082 > pred; 00083 00084 // The number of attributes in the sequence matching the current one 00085 typedef typename boost::mpl::count_if<AttrSeq, pred> currentCount; 00086 00087 // The iterator pointing to the next attribute in the sequence 00088 typedef boost::mpl::next<Iter> nextIter; 00089 00090 // The Duplicates struct using the next iterator 00091 typedef Duplicates<AttrSeq, typename nextIter::type> nextDupl; 00092 00093 public: 00098 static const bool result = (currentCount::value > 1) ? true : nextDupl::result; 00099 00103 typedef typename boost::mpl::eval_if_c< 00104 result, 00105 typename curAttr::type, 00106 typename nextDupl::duplicateAttribute 00107 >::type duplicateAttribute; 00108 }; 00109 00113 template <typename AttrSeq> 00114 struct Duplicates<AttrSeq, typename boost::mpl::end<AttrSeq>::type> { 00115 private: 00116 struct Dummy { 00117 typedef Dummy type; 00118 }; 00119 00120 public: 00121 // \todo: Could anyone please tell me why a static const member is 00122 // not "constant enough" so that I must use this ugly enum?! 00123 // (and why is it sufficient in the general template definition above?!) 00124 enum { 00125 result = false 00126 }; 00127 00128 typedef Dummy duplicateAttribute; 00129 }; 00130 00131 } // end namespace detail 00132 } // end namespace attributes 00133 } // end namespace mw 00134 } // end namespace famouso 00135 00136 #endif